Blackwater Writing Project

February 16, 2007

The good and the bad about...teaching

HI everyone (again),

Just wanted to rant a bit about what I've been doing for the last six weeks. I've had a crash course in No Child Left Behind, Raising Standards, and what it takes to make AYP as a school in the state of Georgia.I've met numerous state officials with the department of ed and they are all highly qualified and capable. I've learned about middle school, about middle school teachers (a very special breed, and I say that in the best sense), and school systems. And this is what I've learned while working at a "needs improvement" school that is in danger of being "contract managed" by the state:

1. There are some really good teachers out there. Veteran teachers and new teachers. Some, however, are lazy. They see any change as "more work" instead of "better work." And the thing is this: these changes have been coming down the pike for years. But as with many people, teachers are slow to change and so now, in the last hours so to speak, they are having to do things. Some of the veteran teachers I work with are very smart and capable, but they are very, very cynical. They barely let me speak before shooting down what I'm saying...they don't have the latest training and some of them don't care to get it.

2. Some teachers really like kids. I mean, they really LIKE them and want to see them succeed. They are not always barking orders at them or looking at them cynically. These are the teachers that succeed (and tend to be better teachers). Some teachers don't like kids...or they are teaching a grade level that is inappropriate for them. It is important for teachers to really think long and hard about the age group they want to work with. Having said all this, it is the attitude of the teacher that is the number one determinant of a student's success. Why? Because students are primarily concerned with two things...1) whether or not the teacher likes them and 2) whether or not the teacher believes they can do the work.

3. You would be amazed at the similarities in teaching college freshmen and high schoolers...or middle schoolers, for that matter. Amazed at the level of literacy that is. I would say that the most crucial part of any student's progress is his or her ability to read, understand, reflect, and synthesize material. But this is not happening...for many students. So many are not being served because the standards are so high. This is the weird paradox of setting standards.

4. These students are savvy at taking tests. They are taught the lingo, given practice tests, spoonfed and beefed up on this stuff. What teachers must do is teach the "test" in different and more creative ways. Teachers are the ONLY place where some of our students can be imaginative. It is up to teachers to initiate and instigate this in students....teachers can do it, if they care.

5. Administrators are trying hard. They have a great deal to work with and some are not all that qualified. Some are put in their positions because of winning seasons or just hanging around for decades. Be patient with them and invite them to learn. Show them what you know. Invite them in, let them be a part of things, keep them in the know.

6. A school's atmosphere has to do with learning...not control...imagination...not stagnation...caring...not criticism...raving instead of ruling...soulfulness instead of soulessness...

7. If you do one thing today to help someone live a better life or feel better just for a moment, would you say your life is worth something? Yes it is! It is important to inspire in everyone around us this thought: Students hold the key to their success, but we, as teachers, show them the door.

4 Comments:

  • I'd love to hear some public school teachers respond to your post. It strikes me as being true at the university as well. Some faculty members like students; others don't.

    I love that "a-ha" moment when I student writes a memorable phrase or uses the perfect verb. In Advanced Composition, I've started pulling out strong sentences from students' texts and reading them to start the class. I call them Moments of Brilliance to celebrate their successes.

    By Blogger Donna Sewell, at 11:12 AM  

  • Hi Donna,

    Yes...this would be a perfect place for public educators to respond to the changes in our policies and procedures. There is a great deal of information to be shared and hashed out.

    I love your "Moments of Brilliance" and this is so important. Teachers need this kind of encouragement too. For some reason, we tend to get into a rut...and we tend to start acting like our students! For example, we can get tantrummy and defensive over the least little thing! I asked some teachers one time: Who is the most positive person you know? They thought a moment and answered with different people, citing their characteristics. Then I asked: Did any of you think that you were the most positive person you knew? They were silent. I asked them why? why not?

    More later...

    Carlyn

    By Blogger Carlyn Maddox, at 1:17 PM  

  • The problem with these new standards is the fact that they are "coming down the pike." We can all appreciate and applaud the research and the various honorifics attached to a person's name, but what has it gotten us?

    The latest "report card" for America's schools indicate that high school seniors in 2005 were poorer readers than seniors in 1992. What does/should this tell us?

    At first glance, it is an indication that raising standards has lowered performance. It could also be extended to say that students are in fact learning less under the new "Learning Focused" strategies than they were fifteen years ago. Students are now taught to perform for the test, to meet a certain standard. Perhaps that standard is not correlative to actually learning to read. Perhaps the problem was never the method in the first place.

    Is that at all possible? And could that be a reason why veteran teachers who saw their students performing at higher levels under their "old" models are now seriously frustrated with the idea that "the latest training" is superior just because it is newer?

    I have no Ed. degree, and I only taught public high school for one semester, but from that one semester I came away feeling like the focus on the Ed. training somehow shortchanged the emphasis on subject mastery, particularly for the students. Appreciating Shakespeare clearly took a backseat to being able to define a pun or metaphor when it came to meeting AYP.

    Take all this for the ravings of a lunatic literacy teacher that they are.

    -Jason

    By Blogger Fisher, at 10:47 PM  

  • And there we have it folks, poor "mental models" rule the day. I could rant on this subject for hours. Taking a systems approach is the only way to handle this problem. Authoritarian styles of leadership don't generally work. Employing a democratic approach will involve the teachers more. Most teachers feel like they are being blamed and are not allowed a part in the fixing. One would argue that they should have when they had the chance, but the bottom line was there wasn't a problem until we changed our focus of what education is for and what it should be. We have had a paradigm shift of monumental proportions. I have an article I am working on that I would love to share a rough draft of. I might do that tomorrow. Actually the original article has turned into four seperate pieces and continues to grow with every thought I have. The bottom line is: "Shift happens." I'll be on thursday and am looking forward to a great write night!
    HATCH

    By Blogger Adam, at 11:10 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home